Edward Leedskalnin – Download as .rtf), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. Edward Leedskalnin. Uploaded by Edward Leedskalnin TPU. My Small scale replication of EDWARD LEEDSKALNIN TP This is a 3/8 u bolt with 2 coils on it. The u bolt is ‘ long and 2’ apart, the top bar. RE: Edward Leedskalnin TPU. «Reply #75, on November 10th, , AM » Last edited on November 10th, , AM by.
|Published (Last):||9 April 2008|
|PDF File Size:||20.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Lasted edited by Andrew Munseyupdated on June 15, at 1: On February 14, I had posted a preface comment for this page saying that I had finally been convinced that it turns out that this effect is recognized by science.
However, based on new information received yesterday, and witnessed first hand last night, I am revising my outlook on this phenomenon. First, credit for the discovery of the effect listed on this page goes to Jerry Smith of Littleton, Colorado, who I met with yesterday, along with about ten other people, including Foster Gamble.
I should say that with my exposure yesterday to Jerry, that my leedsklanin about Leedskalnin has returned to one of awe. Jerry illustrated the below effect for us, to a level that far surpasses what is presented below. He showed how by leedwkalnin applying just 0. It is a room temperature superconductor effect, emitting no external magnetic fields, while retaining a powerful hold. He had DARPA there visiting last week but is not going to be working with them, especially since others are likely to come up with the funding they need.
He also illustrated several other amazing magnetic phenomenon that showed that he has a genius grasp of magnetism and its practical applications. He has successfully brought several inventions to market, and holds many patents. I received a scathing comment from one of Jerry’s friends yesterday, rebuking us for posting the below information on the web leedskalnih something Jerry has spent ten years and several million dollars developing.
We were not aware of the origin of this technology. And when I asked Jerry last night if he leedskzlnin us to take this down, he replied something to the effect: I kept asking for permission to video the many effects he was demonstrating to us, but he declined. Verbally, here is a brief and rough synopsis of exward of the effects we witnessed:. What looked like a brass puck maybe 1. Four iron washers separated vertically on a glass rod above some kind of magnet, and the iron washers were separated by a decreasing distance according to a Fibonacci sequence.
And when the assembly was turned up-side down, the distance increased according to the same ratio. The deward did not drop off. Hopefully, now, these things will be able to finally move forward more rapidly. We found Jerry to be an astonishing person, with a depth of knowledge and scientific curiosity and demonstrated accomplishment that is rare. For some of you, this may be old news, but this is the first that I have encountered this.
Check out this second video by my Directory: In this video, he shows lefdskalnin crazy phenomenon. Two blocks of flat, tool steel with a small channel between them, just large enough to run an gauge, leedzkalnin wire through, ‘become bonded lfedskalnin each other’ when a current from a car battery is very briefly fraction of a second run through the wire. The bond doesn’t seem to be magnetic, as the bonded blocks don’t exhibit any external magnetism, edqard there is barely any magnetism after the halves are sheered apart.
I don’t see any reason why this effect hasn’t already been implemented widely in industry, other than that the mainstream has a hard time putting things to use leedskqlnin they can’t visualize where the energy is coming from, hence perhaps it yet belongs out here among us who don’t have a problem playing with “exotic” modalities.
This certainly sheds some good light on Edward Leedskalnin, who apparently first reported on this effect that edeard called a “Perpetual Motion Holder. The variation illustrated by Rod, as told to him by There was an error working with the wiki: Codemay be much more practical, and may help push this into mainstream science and widespread industrial application.
I called up Mike Waters another of our associates at NEST to get some clarification on a few things, and here are a few things he mentioned:.
Don’t know of any use of this principle in mainstream applications, though there should ,eedskalnin. Can’t remember where he got the idea to use edwqrd flat pieces of metal his are mild steeledwagd was years ago. It seems that the “bonding” effect is proportional to the current that is passed and the amount of time the current is passed, but he never characterized this.
You can undo the “bonding” if you reverse the direction of the current, but only if you do it for close to the same amount of time and current. I picture the following scenario in industry. Something that needs to be supported via this bond has a specific amount of current run through it for a specified amount of time.
The current and polarity and time are notated on a label.
Then, when the item needs to be released, the reverse polarity is run for the same amount of time, and viola, the bond is broken. To be repeated an infinite number of times. No glue, no chemicals, no magnetism required.
In Russ Gries There was an error working with the wiki: Code below, you’ll see deward video where he energized one of these two years ago, and it was still holding and lit up an LED light when he forcefully disengaged it. The number edwwrd applications of this are vast. It could be used for door locks, via a specific combination of currents and polarities that only the user dials in and can reverse.
Then, again, this is a terrible idea, because anyone who tries to unlock the door with any combination is going to be changing the combination. So never mind, on that application. I’d be curious to know what the parameters of this phenomenon are, exploring such variables as:.
Relationship between current, time, block and bond strength, or is it all-or-nothing? It seems there could be a bunch of masters and Ph. Maybe these parameters have been worked out somewhere. Garage tinkers could easily do it. About 25 years ago I had an old car battery in my garage and I assumed it was probably almost dead from not being used for a year. I took a piece of wire about two feet long held the two ends sticking out between my thumbs and forefingers and the middle part of the wire running across the palms of my hands.
I wanted to just touch both battery posts for a split second to see how strong a spark I would get to show if there was still a charge in the battery? When I touched the two ends of the wire to the posts for only a tenth of a second, the two tips of the wire instantly welded themselves to the posts and the wire that I could not get out of my hands quickly enough lit up like a light bulb filament burning me across both palms of my hands badly.
The wire actually stuck to the palms of my hands because it had burned a slot in them and the wire tips were still welded to the battery posts, causing a bad burn in a place you can not help but keep touching when you use your hands and it took a long time to heal.
The fact that the whole thing was such an unexpected surprise also made it take longer to get away from. Also there is always hydrogen coming out of a lead acid battery that the spark can set off all the way back inside the battery causing the battery to explode. So you need to put a warning about this along with this article.
Or any battery for that matter.
Only having a length of wire a couple of feet long is a dead short and definitely will weld itself to the battery. Definitely a disclosure that needs to be posted with all videos and information about the single bar replication.
When using Ed’s Perpetual motion Holder there’s enough wire wrapped around the core that the resistance is fairly high, and the result would not be the same. It’s not a dead short. Leedskalnin’s Perpetual Motion Holder – page at Leedskalnin. Gries page on this at RWGResearch. The device, as it is most widely known, consists of a U-shaped iron or steel bar with an opposing coil on each arm and a separate bar that spans the ends of the U.
It remains in this state as long as the cross piece is in place. As soon as the leedskaonin is pulled off, the magnetic bond is gone, except for a small amount of leedska,nin magnetism.
Many people have done replications of this, including There was an error working with the wiki: Codewho did some experiments using a simple U steel bolt. Several weeks ago, Mike Waters [NEST] mentioned a greatly simplified version of this device that demonstrates the same or very similar effect. I became intrigued enough and un-intimidated enough by the simplicity to attempt a replication.
This device uses no coils and consists simply of two blocks of steel, each with one of the faces dressed so that the blocks fit together very accurately. A narrow slot is machined down the center of the faces such that when the blocks are placed together, a square channel is formed.
A single piece of insulated 16g or 18g copper wire is placed in the center channel, long enough that the ends can be touched to the terminals of a power source.
I obtained a 1″x2″x14″ bar of A-2 De-Carb Free tool steel. The blocks showed a very slight magnetism, most likely from the machining process. With the blocks in place, I first tried touching the ends to a 12V lantern battery.
Although a small spark was produced, there was no noticeable effect on the blocks. Next I took the blocks out to my car and touched the ends briefly to a car battery for just a split second. The blocks were instantly bonded together powerfully enough that it took me 5 minutes or so to finally separate them by shearing them apart. I did this multiple times. Even in the bonded state, the blocks showed little or no magnetism on the outside surfaces.
Mike Waters said that he has kept some for long periods of time in this bonded state. The bonding seems to be permanent and does not diminish over time. With the bars in the bonded state, at one point I left the wire in place and hooked the ends to a voltmeter but there was 0 voltage.
There was also almost no noticeable magnetism on the outside of the steel. What is happening on the inside is the mystery.
The theory is that there is ‘some kind of permanent field set up between the pieces by the electrical pulse’. Here’s the link to my demo: I’ll be doing a better demo and will post when complete. Thanks again to Mike Waters for supplying the specs, instructions and guidance via which this experiment was created and to Dale Franklin for perfectly machined blocks.
Dale Franklin, owner of Contract Manufacturingwho I mention above, is a master machinist who leedskxlnin amazing precision work in his shop using some of the best machining equipment in the world. On February 11,before publishing this page in our news for the first time, I ran this by Russ W. Gries, to get his input.
He responded slightly edited:.